Again the fourth day of the tournament began with its biggest story happening off court. About thirty feet off court in the gym at St. Petersburg College. A pipe burt, making the court unplayable. At the last moment, the Church of Scientology, which is headquartered in host city Clearwater, FL. They offered the gym at their new Super Power Building, the second largest building in Clearwater. Top seed D1, whose leading scorer is a senior psychology major, protested vehemently, but but their pleas fell on deaf ears. With their opponent clearly destracted, D9 took advantage and jumped out to an early lead. D1 rallied in the second half, but the underdog held on for giant upset. According to postgame reports, the parents of a sophomore bench player for D9 are practicing Scientologists and may have contacted the church. The NCAA is investigating.
In the second game game in Clearwater, C4's dominant inside game lead them passed C5 to the Sweet 16 in Groton, CT, with no trouble.
They will play C1, who struggled against C8, but not as much as C8 struggled against them. C1 should be happy that the satellite feed from Newark was lost so that no one saw it. Also advancing from Newark was D12 whose crushing full court press was too much for the dominant inside game of favored D4.
B2 did the favorites proud in Butte and sent B7 home disappointed. In the second game, however, it appeared that the cast on the wrist of the A4 coach from their first round game prevent him from drawing up the winning play. Coming out of a time out trailing by 2 with 6.1 seconds remaining, they were unable to get off a shot, sending A5 to Anchorage to face overall top seed A1.
In the final games of the day in Fresno, B9 fought a hard game, but B1 wore them down at the end to advance to the Bellingham Regional. The last team to secure a place in the Sweet 16 was A6 thanks to a thrilling come-from-behind win over A3. Most pundits had counted A6 out after their 8OT opening game, but they proved them wrong. Welcome to Anchorage, A6!
[A note on the random selection process. There is good data on the first round match ups of seeds, since four times a year for the last 26 years, each pair has played. In each successive round, the number of match ups occur less frequently. There is the probability of, say, a 12 seed making it to the Sweet 16, but if they had to play a 4 seed it would be a more difficult task than playing a 13 seed. It treated each first weekend pod leading up to a team in the Sweet 16 as single event, and chose one random number to select both which team made it to the Sweet 16 and also the team that they beat in the second round.
I scrolled through past Sweet 16s and looked for match up of seeds. For example, a 2 seed has played a 6 seed 25 times in the Sweet 16, in which game the 2 is 20-5, and so I assumed that a number from 1 to 25, and if it was 20 or less, the 2 would advance, and 21-25, the 6 advanced.
Whenever possible, I tried to do this, but it is possible to have combinations that have met only once or not at all. Or, there have been two 4-9 pairings (both won by 4) and two 5-9 pairings (both won by 9), and so I combined them to say that when a 9 plays a 4 or a 5, the odds are 50/50. When the odds are 50/50 or in the Final Four, if two of the same seeds met, I decided the game by a coin toss.]